Source-cited evidence preparation

Turn the messy case folder into a reviewable evidence workbench.

Juris-AI helps attorneys extract, organize, question, and package matter materials into a source-cited chronology, evidence index, key people and dates, contradiction cues, missing-evidence prompts, and attorney-review handoff packet.

01 Extract the record
02 Organize the facts
03 Verify the source
04 Keep counsel in control

The intake bottleneck

Before the legal strategy comes the evidence fog.

Intake materials rarely arrive as a neat litigation file. They arrive as PDFs, texts, screenshots, Word docs, photos, notes, audio, duplicate files, partial memories, and missing context. Juris-AI is focused on the first painful step: turning that fog into a source-cited review surface.

01

The file pile has no shape

Attorneys and staff need to know what is in the bundle before they can decide what matters.

02

The chronology hides in fragments

Dates, people, locations, and events are scattered across documents that were never meant to cooperate.

03

The risk is trusting too fast

AI output is only useful if every important claim can be traced, challenged, and verified by counsel.

The narrowed product

An evidence workbench, not a legal crystal ball.

Juris-AI is being built around a focused flow: upload a matter bundle, extract structured evidence, work through the case materials in a source-cited workbench, ask grounded factual questions, then generate an attorney-review packet.

Clear boundary: No outcome predictions. No liability conclusions. No settlement valuation. No litigation strategy automation.
Extractor

Unzip, ingest, and normalize the matter bundle.

Pull text from supported files, flag OCR or transcription limitations, preserve citations, and prepare the matter for review.

Evidence Synthesizer

Shape the record into attorney-readable structure.

Surface chronology, evidence facts, key people, organizations, places, dates, open questions, and potential contradictions.

Source context

Make every claim easier to inspect.

Drill from timeline events, Ask answers, and packet citations back to snippets, pages, extraction methods, and confidence cues.

Attorney handoff

Export a draft packet for review, not blind reliance.

Generate a source-cited handoff with verification checklist, extraction limitations, citation appendix, and packet metadata.

What the workbench produces

The useful middle layer between raw files and legal judgment.

Chronology

Timeline from the source record

Events organized by date with citation-backed excerpts and attorney verification prompts.

Evidence index

Facts grouped for review

People, documents, dates, places, issues, and events arranged into a reviewable structure.

Contradiction cues

Potential conflicts to inspect

Factual mismatches are framed as counsel-review prompts, not conclusions.

Missing evidence

Referenced items not yet in the file

Policies, attachments, messages, recordings, or records mentioned by the bundle but not present.

Ask this case

Factual answers with refusal boundaries

Ask grounded questions about uploaded matter materials and get source-cited answers or safe refusals.

Packet export

Markdown and DOCX handoff

A draft attorney-review packet with citation appendix, limitations language, and metadata.

Pilot workflow

From messy bundle to review-ready signal.

Upload

Bring the bundle

Start with a folder or ZIP of case materials. The pilot flow is designed around controlled, attorney-approved intake.

Extract

Parse and flag limitations

Extract supported text, identify structured evidence, and clearly flag OCR, transcription, or low-confidence gaps.

Workbench

Review the record

Inspect timeline, evidence, people, places, dates, missing items, contradictions, and cited answers in one place.

Export

Generate the packet

Produce a draft handoff packet that attorneys can verify, edit, annotate, and use to orient the next review step.

Built first for focused pilot signal

For firms that need faster evidence orientation before deeper review.

Juris-AI is being prepared for a controlled private pilot with attorneys who can judge whether a source-cited evidence workbench saves real intake and early-review time. The first release stays narrow on purpose.

Employment matters ADA / disability intake Plaintiff-side review Solo and small firms Messy evidence folders Attorney-supervised workflows
Private pilot preparation

Want to see the workbench on a synthetic case bundle?

Request early access for a founder-led demo and pilot conversation. The current public form is for contact information only. Please do not submit confidential case files, client names, privileged materials, or case documents here.

Important: Real matter intake will require secure auth, storage, written pilot terms, and attorney-approved boundaries.